BioLines

Where Nature and Science Meet

biolines@africabio.com

Vol. 44                             

Sept 2003

Editor: M. Koch

 

AfricaBio

Biotechnology Stakeholders Association

           Tel:  012 667 2689

           Fax: 012 667 1920

                                  www.africabio.com

BioLines is AfricaBio’s ‘Biotechnology Headlines’ – a quick guide to what is topical. By design, the articles are not exhaustive, but references are given to follow up points of interest. Let us know what you like and dislike about BioLines and what you want to see as part of this service. Articles are edited to meet space requirements. It is not the intention of this service to infringe on copyright. Biolines is issued free of charge and every effort is made to acknowledge the source of information.

 

CONTENTS:

 

¨       Removing fears about biotechnology (1)

¨       GMO maize boosts yields of emergent farmers by 220.25% (3)

¨       Kenya grapples with biosafety leg(4)

¨       First Parkinson's gene-therapy patient keeps faith (4)

¨       Genetically engineered plants produce cervical cancer vaccine components (5)

¨       GM plant vaccine for cervical cancer (5)

¨       VC investments in biotech continue to drop (6)

 

 

¨       Gene flow review (6)

¨       Plant vaccines: growing closer to commercial reality (7)

¨       Healthy maize for oils and margarines (7)

¨       Gene link found in type 2 diabetes (8)

¨       Caution urged over GM virus (8)

¨       Hardline ideologues in charity clothes (8)

¨       Bugpower, the energy of the future (9)

¨       Events (10)

¨       Job (11)

____________________________________________________________________­­­­­­­____________

 

"Learn to speak to society through easily understood language, so that the latest inventions can be adopted without resistance"

                                                                             US scientist Professor C.S Prakash                       

 
Removing fears about biotechnology
Duncan Mboyah, Kenya, 19 Aug 03. From AgBioView, 20 Aug 03

Scientists need to communicate with the public in easily understood language to dispel anxiety about biotechnology,
US scientist Professor C.S Prakash has said. Addressing a scientist's communication workshop on biotechnology in Nairobi, Kenya recently, Professor Prakash of Tuskegee University told scientists to stop communicating to fellow scientists only. Lack of proper communication of agricultural biotechnology issues to the public, policy makers and journalists was to blame for the misunderstanding of new technology in the world and especially Africa, Professor Prakash said. As result of this, negative media publicity had raised the public's anxiety since they were unaware of the safeguards surrounding biotechnology products.

"Learn to speak to society through easily understood language, so that the latest inventions can be adopted without resistance," said Professor Prakash, who also noted that the future of biotechnology hinged on how it was perceived by policy makers and the public. Professor Prakash observed it was unfortunate that public concerns over the safety of GM foods and their environmental and socio-economic impacts had neither been addressed by scientists nor communicated in a way the public could understand. GMOs had been consumed by millions of people in the
US for the last 4 years without any harmful effects, after 15 years of thorough testing, he said.


 

 

 

Professor Prakash told scientists to respond to misinformation about biotechnology, network with journalists, write newspaper commentaries and give regular lectures at public forums in a bid to allay public fears. Kenyan legislators attending the workshop suggested more forums were necessary to enable them to understand what biotechnology was all about, before the country's national Biosafety Framework Bill was taken to Parliament for enactment later this year. "From the look of things, biotechnology is a very noble idea of eradicating poverty, but unfortunately the public and the legislators do not understand the protocols and conventions guiding it," legislator Mwancha Okioma said. From the workshop, he could single out biotechnology as one way of eradicating poverty amongst his constituents and henceforth improving the country's economy, Mr Okioma said. Legislator Betty Tett observed that anything new in man's environment was feared until explanations were given to enable acceptance.

 

Executive Director of New Zealand's Life Sciences Network (LSN), Francis Wevers told the workshop that when GMOs were introduced in his country, there was a lot of unbalanced media coverage, uninformed journalists and uncertain politicians. He noted that even scientists were fearful, as was the risk averse agricultural business community. In response to the confusion, the LSN was formed with membership from universities, research institutes, national farmers' organizations and national industry and export organizations, to help assuage public fears. "Our strategy was to engage, educate and inform journalists, politicians and different stakeholders," Mr Wevers said. The strategy was necessary as opponents of GMOs were organized, committed, small in number but vocal and had strong links with the NZGreen Party. Mr. Wevers noted that in its message, the LSN explained the appropriate regulation for public assurance, case-by-case assessment of risks and benefits, and science based decision-making. "Out of this campaign, we achieved balanced media coverage, anti-GMO campaigns lost political attention and a recent anti-GMO protest in the capital city attracted less than 100 people," Mr Wevers said.

 

 

 

 

Legislator Betty Tett observed that anything new in man's environment was feared until explanations were given to enable acceptance.

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 



Members of the African Biotechnology Stakeholders Forum (ABSF) were advised to avoid attacking individuals opposed to them, to always use a scientific basis for their statements and to build alliances in order to have a broad base of support outside agricultural biotechnology. "It is through this approach that the NZ Government allowed importation, development and release of GMOs, regulated by the Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA)." Kenyan journalist Mr. John Wachai told participants that very few newspapers in
Africa have science editors since most institutions offering media training do not have specialised training departments. "Renowned journalism training institutions such as Nairobi University, Daystar University and the Kenya Institute of Mass Communication trained general journalists, and those writing science issues at the moment do so out of their own choice," he said. Mr Wachai challenged scientists to present their facts in a simple manner to enable journalists to communicate the issues to the public, some of
whom had never been to school.

He commended ABSF for offering training opportunities for science journalists in the region and appealed to other organizations to come forward and help equip journalists with scientific skills to enable them to communicate new developments in science with to the public. An entomologist with CAB International Dr. Walter Ogutu told participants, including scientists from 12 African countries, to adopt the NZ communication methodology of involving the concerned parties and the public. Dr Ogutu observed that the approach, which is equivalent to the bottom up approach in development, could make society see the new technology as theirs. "It is even better to send our legislators, scientists, journalists and other stakeholders to NZ for a fact finding mission on the viability of GMOs," Dr Ogutu suggested, reacting to a call from legislators for time to see for themselves how GM foods have been adopted in other countries, before they enact Kenya's Biosafety Bill that will
legalise importation and production of GM crops.

GMO maize boosts yields of emergent farmers by 220.25%

Hans Lombard Public Relations, AfricaBio Press release, 13 Apr 03

 

KwaZulu-Natal emergent crop farmers from the Hiabisa district near Nongoma in Northern KZN who planted GMO white maize for the first time this season have boosted their yields by an average increase of 220.25% and increased their income by an average of R2 825.00. Their smallholdings average 2½ ha. The seed they planted was CRN 4549 Bt marketed by Monsanto.

 

“Bt maize has changed our lives. The emergent farmers’ struggle for survival will be greatly reduced in future. Now we can eradicate poverty and produce enough food to feed our people. Farming will be better now, as we do not have to worry about the stalkborer that destroyed our crop in the past. This new technology is what Africa needs to overcome famine and food shortages”, says Richard Sithole, chairman of the Hlabisa District Farmers’ Union. He has been chairman since 1982. The farmers’ union comprises some 150 emergent farmers. The population of the community is roughly 4 000. The farmers harvest their maize by hand, shell it by hand and package it in 70kg bags selling for R100. All the maize is bought by the community. Sithole’s yield on his 2½ ha was 100 bags compared with 80 bags the previous season with normal hybrid seed. This was an increase of 20 bags or 25%, bringing in an additional income of R 2000, excluding the cost-savings on pesticides. “The increase in yields, as all of us who planted GMO maize this season have experienced, brings more money into our pockets which will be spent in our community, boosting the informal and small business sector,” he added.

 

He said farmers are happy to buy new seed every year to benefit from the higher yields fresh seed guarantees. For many years now, farmers have no longer been saving seed to plant the following year. This habit reduced production. All the farmers use 3.2.1 (25) fertilizer at planting followed by a top dressing of LAN 6 weeks later. “Our emergent farmers are now focussing on agriculture as a business. In the first place to produce food for himself plus a substantial surplus that can be converted into cash to improve his livelihood, to improve his home, to send his children to school and to college to earn a better living for themselves,’ he added. He cited his own case as an example. He started farming in 1969 with a bicycle. By always buying the latest hybrid seeds that became available he increased his income. From the bicycle he progressed to a bakkie. Then followed a tractor, plough and planter. Next he built himself a 7-roomed home. All paid for.

 

Three fellow farmers confirmed their increased yields as follows:

 

  • Paulos Mwelase of Siwohlo-Kwa Hlabisa planted 2 ha of Bt maize. Yield 45 bags compared to 6 bags “of rotten maize” last year. An increase of 650%. He will keep 10 bags for himself for food and sell 35 bags for R3 500. He is chairman of the Thubalethu Farmers’ Union. “We have never seen maize like this before. Last year I could not cover my fertilizer and seed costs. Now things are looking better. The farming struggles of the past are becoming less,” he said.

  • Daniel Ndwandwe planted ½ a hectare. His yield was 14 bags compared to 10 bags last year. A yield increase of 40%.

  • Wilson Nkosi palnted 2 hectares. His yield was 80 bags compared to 30 bags last year, an increase of 166% or R5 000 extra income. “There is nothing that will ever separate me from Bt maize. The higher price of the seed is not an issue. I am going to double my planting next season,” he emphasised.

DID YOU KNOW?Planting estimates suggest that GM       hectarage in South Africa in 2003 will increase to

300 000 ha of maize (10%), 24 000 ha of cotton (88%) and 30 000 ha of soya (27%).

                                                         

SASAE Symposium 2003

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Kenya grapples with biosafety leg
Kimani Chege, Kenya, 19 Aug03. From Agbioview 20 Aug 03 (shortened)

African biotechnology crusaders are working around the clock to convince their governments to embrace technology as a remedy to the food crisis in the continent. Through workshops and brain storming sessions with policy makers, scientists and crop-biology experts are assertively lobbying for the passing of key biosafety legislation. In Kenya biotech enthusiasts recently organized a 3-day communication workshop, in which members of Parliament shared their thoughts about biotechnology with scientists. Under the Africa Biotechnology Stakeholders Forum (ABSF), an international biotechnology group, the meeting sought better ways of convincing policy makers to pass legislation that supported biotechnology. The meeting was addressed by top scientists from all over the world, including Professor. C S Prakash from Tuskegee University in the US and the Executive Director of the Life Sciences Network in NZ, Francis Wevers.

 

Kenyan parliamentarians requested more information from scientists to help them understand the science involved in biotechnology, before any Bill is introduced in Parliament. Kenya is in the process of drafting a biosafety Bill and biotechnology policy that will help the country undertake the research and adoption of biotech crops. Research and trials with GM sweet potato, Bt maize and Irish potato are currently going on at the Government's Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), in collaboration with major international research organizations. Tissue culture technology on banana, cassava and citrus has been embraced in Kenya with much enthusiasm. However further developments have been hampered by ineffective laws and policy maker's lack of information about
biotechnology. The country is presently acting under a set of rules developed in 1998 to guide it on the adoption of biotechnology.

The story is the same for other countries in
Africa, who are developing laws to cope with the technology as it emerges. Only SA and Nigeria have active biotech laws, which are still under review. Zambia, a country that shocked the world by rejecting GM food donations when the country was starving, is showing some change in their approach. Recently scientists and academics at Zambia University developed a biotechnology society to help advocate the technology in the country. The Biotechnology Outreach Society of Zambia (BOSZ) will mount an aggressive awareness campaign that will involve all stakeholders to discuss issues relating to biotechnology.

 

 

First Parkinson's gene-therapy patient keeps faith
Ransdell Pierson, 20 Aug 03. From
Reuters (shortened)

 
Two days after becoming the first adult to receive gene therapy for Parkinson's disease, Nathan Klein said he was glad to have taken "a big step forward, or maybe backward" to help himself and others with the progressive movement disorder. The 55-year-old television producer was up and about and in wise-cracking good spirits, at a press conference at New York-Presbyterian Hospital, where surgeons performed the risky 5-hour brain operation. "It feels good to get all this attention. I've never been on this end of the camera before," said Klein, who helped produce the syndicated television programme "Everyday with Joan Lunden" in the early 1990s. Klein said he felt no better or any worse than before the operation, during which Dr. Michael Kaplitt delivered gene therapy droplets to the target area of his brain through an opening in his skull. The droplets contained countless copies of a normally occurring gene, called GAD, that doctors hope will begin producing its designated protein. The protein, in turn, is meant to produce a molecule called GABA, whose role in the brain is to calm overexcited nerve cells. The genes are unable by themselves to enter brain cells. So each copy was stuffed into a seemingly harmless virus called the adeno-associated virus, which can penetrate human cells and drop off its gene cargo.

 

Parkinson's, which affects 1.5 million Americans, is a progressive disorder in which damage to nerve cells in a deep part of the brain eventually causes muscle shaking or rigidity, poor coordination and difficulty in walking. The nerve damage disrupts production of GABA as well as a brain messenger chemical called dopamine that sends nerve signals to muscles. "GABA normally acts as a brake to control firing of neurons, but the firing becomes extremely rapid" among people with Parkinson's, said Dr. Matthew During, a medical professor at the University of Auckland who helped conduct earlier animal trials of the gene therapy technique. The hope is the transplanted genes will spur production of enough new GABA molecules to replace those lost to the disease.

 

Klein is the first of 12 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease the hospital aims to treat with the technique, which was approved by US regulators. All must have had the disease for at least 5 years and no longer benefit from available drugs and surgical treatments. New York-Presbyterian plans to begin treating the second patient in about a month, after assessing whether Klein is safely weathering the procedure. In the meantime, doctors said they hope he will not encounter serious side effects from the therapy, including fever and potentially dangerous brain inflammation. Klein, his full head of silver hair parted on either side of an eight-inch surgical scar, exuded nothing but optimism. "I hope the gene therapy gives me a chance of getting better because right now I have trouble walking and can't play ball with my son," he said in an interview. He said he was no longer helped by Parkinson's treatments, including a widely used pill called levodopa that is converted into dopamine when it enters the brain. Klein said he plans to return home today to Port Washington, New York and enjoy some good home cooking prepared by his wife, Claire. "A cheeseburger would be fine; nothing too healthy," said Klein, whose 14-year-old twin daughter and son will help throw him a return-home party over the weekend.

 

Scores of gene therapy trials have been launched without success since 1990, for a wide array of diseases, including cystic fibrosis, AIDS and cancer. Two French boys with severe immune deficiency were cured with gene therapy, but they later developed leukemia, casting a cloud over the potential of such treatments.

 


Genetically engineered plants produce cervical cancer vaccine components
SeedQuest, 15 Aug 03. From AgBioView 21 Aug 03. (shortened) http://www.seedquest.com/News/releases/2003/august/6409.htm
 

Researchers from Germany have GM plants to produce particles of human papillomavirus (HPV) that could be used in the creation of vaccines or as edible vaccines themselves. They report their findings
in the Sept 03 issue of the Journal of Virology. 'Cervical cancer is linked to infection with HPV and is the 3rd most common cancer among women worldwide. There is a strong demand for the development of an HPV preventive vaccine,' say the researchers.

In the study, the researchers genetically engineered tobacco and potato plants to produce a major structural protein of HPV. When the protein was purified and administered to mice, it induced an immune response. When the potatoes were fed to mice, they also induced an immune response, though not as significant. 'Here, we demonstrated as a first step that it is possible to produce transgenic pla